The cartography file on Tradebase opened the day the first victim hash arrived in our intake queue. On the surface, the operation presented as a regulated brokerage with a tasteful frontend and the standard onboarding script. What follows is a structured review of the entity’s chain footprint, jurisdictional posture, and recovery handles.
Trail review
The cartographer’s plot of Tradebase produces three readable layers:
1. The presentation layer — the broker’s public-facing narrative, marketing assets, and onboarding flow. 2. The custody layer — the receiving and consolidation addresses where deposited funds actually live. 3. The exit layer — the off-ramps, bridges, and exchange-deposit addresses where laundered value leaves the on-chain space.
Most recovery firms only chart the first layer. Cointiverse maps all three. In the Tradebase file, layer-three cartography surfaced multiple jurisdictional handles that compliance officers can act on — even where layer-one is uncooperative.
Recovery handles identified
From the Tradebase cartography, the following recovery handles are charted: Exchange-side touch points at jurisdictions cooperative with US/UK/EU compliance procedures. Bridge-contract endpoints that have, in similar cases, responded to forensic substantiation. Stablecoin issuer handles which provide a non-exchange freeze pathway.
Have you been involved with this entity?
Cointiverse maintains the case file index as an active forensic resource. If your loss event intersects with Tradebase, the cartographer can review your specific transaction hashes against the existing map.
[Open a Case →](/submit-a-case/) · [Run a Wallet Check](/wallet-checker/)
Disclaimer: Listing in the Cointiverse case file index reflects forensic review of on-chain behavior and victim reports. It is not an assertion of criminal liability.