The Second Hook: Mapping a $21,700 Fake-Recovery Scam Run Through Gloffix
After losing money once, a Singapore retiree was contacted by a “fund recovery unit” operating through Gloffix that promised to get it all back — for an up-front fee. We stopped the second theft and traced it fast.
The Terrain
Mr Tan had already lost money to an earlier scam — which is exactly why the next call landed. A polished “asset recovery unit” said it could claw back his funds and asked him to set up an account with Gloffix to “receive the restituted balance.” To release the recovery, they said, he first had to pay processing and “legal” fees in USDT and prepaid vouchers.
Victims of one scam are systematically re-targeted by a second; the grief and the hope are the terrain a recovery-scam exploits.
Where the Trail Forked
The fork was the up-front fee. A legitimate recovery effort is paid from results or on clear terms — it never asks you to fund an account on a platform it chose and then pay vouchers to unlock “your” money. Mr Tan paid $21,700 across several transfers before contacting us, suspicious at last.
They knew I’d been scammed before. That’s how they got me the second time — they sold me hope.
Charting the Flow
We moved quickly, because recovery-scam money is usually fresh on the chain.
Stopped the bleeding
Our first action was to tell Mr Tan to send nothing further — no “final fee,” no “tax” — which halted the scheme mid-extraction.
Anchored recent transfers
His payments to Gloffix were only days old, so we fixed the deposit addresses while the funds were still warm.
Traced the short route
The USDT had moved just one or two hops and landed, largely intact, at a single KYC-bound exchange.
Filed an urgent freeze
We submitted a same-week flow report and freeze request, flagging the active recovery-scam pattern.
Recovered almost all of it
The exchange froze the deposit; the bulk was returned, and we documented the voucher payments for the police report.
At Journey’s End
$20,200 recovered — 93% of the lossThis is what fast action looks like. Because Mr Tan stopped paying and came to us within days, the funds had barely moved and most were still recoverable at one cooperative venue. We say it plainly: nobody legitimate asks for an up-front fee to recover your money — the request itself is the tell.
Marks on the Map
- If you have been scammed once, assume a “recovery” offer is the second scam until proven otherwise.
- No legitimate recovery service asks you to fund an account it chose, then pay fees to unlock your own money.
- Up-front fees in USDT or prepaid vouchers are a hallmark of fraud.
- Speed matters most here: recovery-scam funds are usually only days old and still traceable.
Been offered your money back for an up-front fee? Stop, and let us map it before the second theft completes — there is never a fee to send funds with us.
Open a Case